Hampstead Heath baby bunny.
Two weeks ago I bought myself a new camera body, the Nikon D700. This is my first full frame digital SLR, and it’s taken a little getting used to. It’s been a long time since I used a full frame camera, and now that I think about it I’ve had a quite a few cameras…
My first experience with a camera was our family camera, an Olympus Trip 35. A pretty little thing that was super easy to use.
Back in the early 1980’s, in my childhood years I had a couple of cheap 110 cameras, which took small cartridges of 110 film. The cameras were light weight, being made of thin plastic. They were point and shoot, focus-free, the sort where you had no control over anything other than what you point it at. I remember loving a red Coca Cola branded 110 camera I had when I was about 10. The sound of winding on the camera manually after each frame with a click click click….
I first used a 35mm film SLR camera back at college in the early 1990’s when I started at college. The camera of choice of the photography department was the Pentax Spotmatic. A tough, reliable and rather handsome camera. Around that time a family friend loaned me a Spotmatic for family holiday in Canada. I really enjoyed using it. I had a choice of two or three lenses, and it really opened my eyes to the techniques and skill I’d have to try and get to grips with, if I wanted to take better images.
In the mid 1990’s bought my first 35mm SLR, a Pentax P30t, with a 28-80mm kit lens. I used this camera for many years during and after college, through the 1990’s and into the 2000’s. I still have this camera, and it still works well. I last used it a few of years ago in Richmond Park.
My first digital camera was a Konica Minolta / DiMAGE Xt, which I bought in 2003. It was my first venture into the digital realm. Why didn’t I buy a Digital SLR ? Back then the prices were way to high for the hobbyist. Thousands of pounds just for the camera body. So I had no real choice but to try a digital point and shoot. It was slow and clunky camera with a tiny display, about one inch across, and yet it was tough as a tank. It still works today for a few minutes before the battery drains ! This little camera re-ignited my passion for photography. The ease at which I could take an image and load it into a computer made it very useful. I even used a few photographs of marble stone taken with this little camera in my VFX work as ice textures. The photograph of the rabbit above was taken with this little point and shoot.
Take-Away snack
Nikon D50 Nikkor 70-300mm f4.5-5.6
Later, as prices of DSLRs started to fall, I decided I would like a new digital camera, like my old Pentax, a proper digital SLR. I looked at a Canon model and a Nikon. I chose the Nikon, a Nikon D50 with 18-55mm kit lens. I chose this over the Canon simply because it fit in my hand better, I found it easier to use, and somehow I preferred the overall design. I was initially disappointed as the images didn’t seem to match the result I had been getting with the Konica Minolta. How could this be ? Surely a DSLR would be better than the digital compact ? It didn’t seem to be a patch on the old Pentax either.
I realised it wasn’t the camera, it was me. I had forgotten much from my college days of photography. The point and shoot had made me lazy, and I’d forgotten how to use the tools an SLR camera offers in order to capture the image I wanted to see. In order to take better images I should re-learn how to use the camera. So, I read books, magazines and websites. I kept taking photos. And I read. And I took photos. And I read. And I took photos…. It took a long time to get used to the D50 but it was worth it.
A couple of years later, I traded up the Nikon D50 to a Nikon D80. This camera was similar to the D50, but it had a few more features, and again it helped me learn more and more. I also began to upgrade my lenses and other kit such as tripod, filters, flash etc.
My next camera was a Nikon D300, which I have been using for a few years now. The D300 fantastic camera, perfect for wildlife and nature, the very things I love to shoot. With decent performance ( much better than the D50 and D80 ) it has captured images that I have really been pleased with. It has taught me very much.
About a year later I needed a new camera for a specific holiday where I knew I couldn’t take my usual kit bag. I need a small compact camera, with SLR-like controls and a good lens. I chose the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3. This little camera has a really good rear screen, bright and clear. It’s controls a easy and quick to use. But it’s number one selling point is that it features a Leica 24-60mm f2-2.8 lens that is optically stabilized. It’s an incredible little camera that if controlled well can take stunning images. This camera remains my fall back tool when I can’t use my DSLRs.
To return to DSLR cameras, one thing thing always bothered me with the D50, D80 and D300; they are “cropped frame” cameras. That is to say, the sensor that captures the image is smaller than a regular 35mm piece of film. This means the camera sees a more narrow view of a scene than a regular 35mm camera. The view is in effect cropped. So if you put a 50mm lens on a cropped frame sensor camera, you get a restricted view, and the lens no longer acts like a 50mm lens. When I used to use my old film cameras I was used to how a 50mm lens would look and feel, but on a cropped frame camera the image appears zoomed in, or cropped. Also the view finder was different. My old film camera had a bigger brighter view. It was easier to see and focus. From the beginning Nikon gave it’s cropped frame sensor cameras the name “DX format” cameras.
Here’s and example of how a 50mm lens sees the world on a DX format camera and an FX format camera :
50mm lens on a DX format camera ( left ) and an FX format camera ( right )
At the same time my D300 was released, Nikon also released the D3. This was Nikon’s first full frame DSLR with a sensor much closer in size to a frame of 35mm film. Canon have had full frame camera’s in their line up for many years, and Nikon was slow to catch up. Luckily, the D3 was a wonderful camera. It re-wrote the book about high ISO noise ( meaning photographs showed much lower levels of speckled noise ). This was Nikon’s first “FX format” camera. Sadly for me, the price was much more than I was willing to spend.
A few months later came the release of the D700, which in essence is the sensor from the D3 in a compact body, very similar to the D300. Here they are side by side :
Nikon D300 and D700
( image taken from mansurovs.com which is an excellent website )
The Nikon D700 is a few years old now, and the Nikon community has been waiting for a replacement with eager anticipation. Recently Nikon finally announced the successor, the D800. It looks really good, but for me it’s too much camera for my practical uses. So, for a number of reasons, I recently I decided to buy myself a D700 and I’m very glad I did.
With the Nikon D700, I feel like I’ve travelled full circle. My passion for photography was started with film point and shoot cameras, and then took off when I started using a film SLR. And now with digital, I’ve had the same journey, I started with a point and shoot, and worked my way through various DSLRs to a full frame camera. A 50mm lens now feels like 50mm lens again. The view finder is bigger and brighter. It feels more like the Pentax Spotmatic again.
The D300 is just as useful and valid and the D700 and they complement each other well. I’m very pleased to use either of them. And Lumix LX3 is a great addtion to these two DSLRs.
And I must point out that I still feel I’m learning every time I pick up the camera. Photography for me is similar to sketching, drawing or painting, a constant road of learning along which we travel. No one ever reaches a destination of full knowledge. After two weeks with the D700, I’m having a blast learning how the FX format changes how I see the world.
Nikon D700 with Nikkor 50mm f1.4 @ f2.0 ISO 3200